Factors Affecting Fish Entrainment into Massive Water Diversions in a Tidal Freshwater Estuary: Can Fish Losses be Managed?. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 29(5), 1253-1270.(2009).
Fish, Floods, and Ecosystem Engineers: Aquatic Conservation in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. BioScience. 59(1), 53-64.(2009).
Mountain Meadows of the Sierra Nevada: An Integrated Means of Determining Ecological Condition in Mountain Meadows—Protocols and Results from 2006..(2009).
Non-native fish in the fresh waters of Portugal, Azores and Madeira Islands: a growing threat to aquatic biodiversity. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 16(4), 255–264.(2009).
Quantifying activated floodplains on a lowland regulated river: its application to floodplain restoration in the Sacramento Valley. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 7(1),(2009).
Aquatic ecosystems. (Healey, M., Dettinger M., & Norgaard R., Ed.).The State of Bay-Delta Science 2008. 55-72.(2008).
Changes in fish diets and mercury accumulation in Clear Lake, California: effects of an invasive planktivorous fish. Ecological Applications. 18(8 Supplement), A213-A226.(2008).
The Economic Costs and Adaptations for Alternative Delta Regulations Technical Appendix F. Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta..(2008).
Economic Effects on Agriculture of Water Export Salinity South of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. (Lund, J. R., Hanak E., Fleenor W. E., Bennett W. A., Howitt R., Mount JF., et al., Ed.).Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.(2008).
Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook salmon in a California river. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 83(4),(2008).
An expert survey on the viability of delta fish populations. Technical Appendix E to Comparing Futures for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. 29.(2008).
The Future of Fish in Response to Large-Scale Change in the San Francisco Estuary, California. American Fisheries Society Symposium. 64,(2008).
The future of the delta ecosystem and its fish. Technical Appendix D to Lund, J., et al., Comparing futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta. 38.(2008).
Life-history traits of non-native fishes in Iberian watersheds across several invasion stages: a first approach. Biological Invasions. 10(1), 89-102.(2008).
Projecting Cumulative Benefits of Multiple River Restoration Projects: An Example from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River System in California. Environmental Management. 42(6), 933-945.(2008).
Protecting migration routes. Issues in Science and Technology. 24 (summer)(4),(2008).
Review of: Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. (Guy, CS., & Brown ML., Ed.).Quarterly Review of Biology. 83, 203-204.(2008).
Role of hardwood in forming habitat for southern California steelhead. Proceedings of the sixth California oak symposium: today's challenges, tomorrow's opportunities. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-217. 307-319.(2008).
Serpentine haiku. California Coast and Ocean. 24(2), 40.(2008).
Baseline Assessment of Salmonid Habitat and Aquatic Ecology of the Nelson Ranch, Shasta River, California Water Year 2007.(2007).
Coho Salmon are Native South of San Francisco Bay: A Reexamination of North American Coho Salmon's Southern Range Limit. Fisheries. 32(9), 441-451.(2007).
Homogenous rivers, homogenous faunas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(14), 5711-5712.(2007).
Patterns In The Use Of A Restored California Floodplain By Native And Alien Fishes. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 5(3),(2007).
Regional Agreements, Adaptation, and Climate Change: New Approaches to FERC Licensing in the Sierra Nevada, California.(2007).
Biological Invasions: Recommendations for U.S. Policy and Management. Ecological Applications. 16(6), 2035-2054.(2006).
Making a precarious perch more secure: Central Valley farm ponds for native fish conservation. Sustainable Agriculture . 18(3),(2006).
Managing Fire-Prone Forests in the Western United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 4(9), pp. 481-487.(2006).
Predicting Invasion Success: Freshwater Fishes in California as a Model. BioScience. 56(6), 515-524.(2006).
Review of Freshwater Fishes of Mexico by Robert Rush Miller. (Miller, R. Rush, Ed.).Quarterly Review of Biology . 81,(2006).
Salmon, Wildlife, and Wine: Marine-Derived Nutrients in Human-Dominated Ecosystems of Central California. Ecological Applications. 16(3), 999-1009.(2006).
Alien fishes in California’s marine environments. (Allen, L. G., & Horn M. H., Ed.).Ecology of California marine fishes. . 611–620.(2005).
A conceptual model for floodplain restoration. Flood Management Association News . 15(4), 7-10.(2005).
Native Fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Drainage, California: A History of Decline. (Rinne, J. N., Hughes R. M., & Calamusso B., Ed.).Historical Changes in Large River Fish Assemblages of the Americas. 45, 75-98.(2005).
Untested assumptions: Effectiveness of Screening Diversions for Conservation of Fish Populations. Fisheries. 30(5), 20-28.(2005).
Variability in Length-Weight Relationships Used to Estimate Biomass of Estuarine Fish from Survey Data. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 134(2), 481-495.(2005).
Alien Fishes in California Watersheds: Characteristics of Successful and Failed Invaders. Ecological Applications. 14(2), 587-596.(2004).
Biology and Population Dynamics of Sacramento Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco Estuary: A Review. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 2(2), 1-47.(2004).